Ball Security Elo
Online player rating for keeping own-team turnovers down.
| Status | implemented | Short Name | Sec |
|---|---|---|---|
| Rating Style | impact | Where Shown | player pages, players leaderboard |
Model Card
Sequential event model on negative turnovers per 100 possessions. Positive values mean a player's minutes tend to improve team ball security.
Validation here is out of sample. From two weeks into each season, a model trained on earlier games predicts each following week without learning from that week. Predictions use the players' observed minutes; each point is the minutes-weighted predicted and actual rate in that player's games. The source inputs were not verified as identical to the published model revision.
Selected League / Season
Change league with the League selector at the top of the page.
Held-out player predictions
Plot Ball Security Elo against any counting stat (one point per player; choose any season with a served list).
Not enough held-out play to show a validation plot. NCAAM 2026-2027: 0 eligible players. A player needs at least 100 held-out minutes. Computed 2026-11-14 13:21:13.755478+00:00.
NCAAM 2025-2026: 3767 players with at least 100 held-out minutes. Across players, predicted and actual correlate at r = 0.93 (weighted by held-out minutes). Across these player averages, weighted R² = 0.71 (relative to the weighted mean of actual held-out outcomes). Per held-out team game, squared error is 15.2% below predicting the league average. Each dot is a player (500 with the most held-out minutes are plotted; larger dots had more); on the dashed line, actual equals predicted. Select a dot for the player.
Held-out miss against playing time
Each dot is a player's actual minus predicted team minus turnovers per 100 possessions in the player's games against their held-out minutes (log scale). Orange points are the minutes-weighted mean miss of eight equal groups of players by playing time: a model that shrinks its low-minutes players too far, or not far enough, shows a slope.
Above prediction
| Player | Held-out minutes | Predicted | Actual |
|---|---|---|---|
| D. Dent | 1099 | -14.0 | -11.8 |
| Carson Johnson | 993 | -14.6 | -12.3 |
| Nils Machowski | 963 | -14.1 | -12.1 |
| Kingston Flemings | 1052 | -13.0 | -11.0 |
| M. Uzan | 1090 | -13.0 | -11.1 |
| E. Sharp | 963 | -12.9 | -11.0 |
| John Blackwell | 1065 | -13.6 | -11.8 |
| D. Mitchell | 970 | -15.1 | -13.3 |
| N. Boyd | 1045 | -13.6 | -11.8 |
| J. Paveletzke | 998 | -15.8 | -14.0 |
Below prediction
| Player | Held-out minutes | Predicted | Actual |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jakobi Heady | 1016 | -17.3 | -18.3 |
| Aidan Mahaney | 983 | -17.4 | -18.2 |
| Joel Foxwell | 1085 | -17.7 | -18.3 |
| A. Spadone | 1025 | -17.3 | -17.8 |
| M. Odum | 1014 | -16.0 | -16.5 |
| J. Mitchell | 964 | -18.0 | -18.5 |
| J. Williams | 959 | -17.3 | -17.6 |
| A. Lindsey | 1027 | -16.0 | -16.3 |
| J. Kinziger | 1026 | -16.1 | -16.5 |
| T. Leonhardt | 1049 | -18.7 | -18.9 |
Stat RAPM or event Elo, per season
Each season serves one method for this stat: stat RAPM when its predictions followed the actual per-segment margin better on held-out games (fit before a date, scored on later segments) by more than two paired standard errors; within that the two are tied and the event Elo serves. Correlations are small in absolute terms; a segment holds about one such event.
| League | Season | Serves | Stat RAPM | Event Elo | Paired SE | Held-out segments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NCAAM | 2024-2025 | event Elo (within noise (tie)) | 0.061 | 0.059 | 0.0023 | 73433 |
| NCAAM | 2015-2016 | event Elo (within noise (tie)) | 0.051 | 0.054 | 0.0031 | 56157 |
| NCAAM | 2014-2015 | event Elo (within noise (tie)) | 0.055 | 0.050 | 0.0034 | 56484 |
| NCAAM | 2013-2014 | stat RAPM | 0.061 | 0.052 | 0.0027 | 59475 |
| NCAAM | 2012-2013 | stat RAPM | 0.064 | 0.057 | 0.0029 | 53932 |
| NCAAM | 2011-2012 | stat RAPM (within noise (tie); stat RAPM served under the earlier rule) | 0.054 | 0.050 | 0.0021 | 53101 |
| NCAAM | 2010-2011 | stat RAPM (within noise (tie); stat RAPM served under the earlier rule) | 0.048 | 0.043 | 0.0029 | 51034 |
| NCAAM | 2009-2010 | event Elo (within noise (tie)) | 0.051 | 0.056 | 0.0026 | 56900 |
| NBA | 2025-2026 | stat RAPM | 0.056 | 0.038 | 0.0043 | 16855 |
Output Coverage
Rows in each model's current published run (or legacy rows where no run is selected).
| League | Season | Rows |
|---|---|---|
| WNBA | 2026 | 217 |
| NCAAW | 2026-2027 | 2463 |
| NCAAW | 2025-2026 | 4434 |
| NCAAW | 2024-2025 | 3730 |
| NCAAW | 2023-2024 | 3367 |
| NCAAW | 2021-2022 | 3967 |
| NCAAW | 2020-2021 | 3010 |
| NCAAW | 2018-2019 | 3661 |
| NCAAW | 2017-2018 | 3559 |
| NCAAW | 2015-2016 | 2214 |
| NCAAW | 2014-2015 | 1601 |
| NCAAW | 2013-2014 | 2117 |
| NCAAM | 2026-2027 | 2849 |
| NCAAM | 2025-2026 | 4582 |
| NCAAM | 2023-2024 | 3858 |
| NCAAM | 2022-2023 | 4200 |
| NCAAM | 2021-2022 | 3922 |
| NCAAM | 2020-2021 | 3226 |
| NCAAM | 2019-2020 | 3289 |
| NCAAM | 2018-2019 | 3619 |
| NCAAM | 2017-2018 | 3562 |
| NCAAM | 2016-2017 | 3689 |
| NCAAM | 2015-2016 | 3828 |
| NCAAM | 2014-2015 | 3760 |
| NCAAM | 2009-2010 | 3951 |
| NBA | 2026-2027 | 373 |
| NBA | 2024-2025 | 531 |
| NBA | 2023-2024 | 529 |
| NBA | 2022-2023 | 504 |
| NBA | 2021-2022 | 534 |
| NBA | 2020-2021 | 515 |
| NBA | 2019-2020 | 445 |