๐Ÿปโฌ‡๏ธ๐Ÿ€

Steve Pikiell

โ† Teams

Coach Rating

0.18 Rating
#50 National Rank
NCAAM League
2026-2027 As of Season

Joint program + coach model (log-odds scale): what the coach adds to the program's own quality; +1.0 makes a team a 73% favorite over the same program with an average coach. Ranked among that season's head coaches.

Career season coverage is unconfirmed.

Season-by-Season

Season Team Record Win % PPG DPPG Margin Elo Pyth AdjO AdjD League Actions
2025-2026 Rutgers Scarlet Record unavailable pending coaching-handoff evidence - - - - 1053 (#127) 65.1% (#113)
Adjusted Efficiency
74.2 (#127) 71.3 (#127) NCAAM View โ†’
2024-2025 Rutgers Scarlet Record unavailable pending coaching-handoff evidence - - - - 1099 (#96) 82.3% (#70)
Adjusted Efficiency
79.4 (#74) 71.7 (#74) NCAAM View โ†’
2023-2024 Rutgers Scarlet Record unavailable pending coaching-handoff evidence - - - - 1024 (#141) 75.8% (#93)
Adjusted Efficiency
67.4 (#97) 61.6 (#97) NCAAM View โ†’
2022-2023 Rutgers Scarlet Record unavailable pending coaching-handoff evidence - - - - 1112 (#93) 92.2% (#20)
Adjusted Efficiency
69.5 (#27) 57.0 (#27) NCAAM View โ†’
2021-2022 Rutgers Scarlet Record unavailable pending coaching-handoff evidence - - - - 1142 (#72) 81.3% (#79)
Adjusted Efficiency
69.6 (#83) 62.4 (#83) NCAAM View โ†’
2020-2021 Rutgers Scarlet Record unavailable pending coaching-handoff evidence - - - - 1242 (#50) 88.5% (#42)
Adjusted Efficiency
72.7 (#39) 61.3 (#39) NCAAM View โ†’
2019-2020 Rutgers Scarlet Record unavailable pending coaching-handoff evidence - - - - 1289 (#34) 92.3% (#24)
Adjusted Efficiency
71.7 (#30) 59.0 (#30) NCAAM View โ†’
2018-2019 Rutgers Scarlet Record unavailable pending coaching-handoff evidence - - - - Data withheld: source-integrity hold 80.6% (#64)
Adjusted Efficiency
71.3 (#74) 64.6 (#74) NCAAM View โ†’
2017-2018 Rutgers Scarlet Record unavailable pending coaching-handoff evidence - - - - 1047 (#139) 69.6% (#108)
Adjusted Efficiency
66.0 (#117) 62.4 (#117) NCAAM View โ†’
2016-2017 Rutgers Scarlet Record unavailable pending coaching-handoff evidence - - - - 974 (#186) 64.3% (#109)
Adjusted Efficiency
67.2 (#122) 64.8 (#122) NCAAM View โ†’
2015-2016 Stony Brook Record unavailable pending coaching-handoff evidence - - - - 1207 (#59) 69.4% (#107)
Adjusted Efficiency
70.8 (#100) 65.2 (#100) NCAAM View โ†’
2014-2015 Stony Brook Record unavailable pending coaching-handoff evidence - - - - 1092 (#114) 53.1% (#149)
Adjusted Efficiency
63.9 (#142) 62.2 (#142) NCAAM View โ†’
2013-2014 Stony Brook Record unavailable pending coaching-handoff evidence - - - - 1063 (#127) 49.9% (#166)
Adjusted Efficiency
68.4 (#170) 68.5 (#170) NCAAM View โ†’
2012-2013 Stony Brook Record unavailable pending coaching-handoff evidence - - - - 1224 (#62) 78.2% (#77)
Adjusted Efficiency
65.5 (#69) 58.0 (#69) NCAAM View โ†’
2011-2012 Stony Brook Record unavailable pending coaching-handoff evidence - - - - 1072 (#136) 55.3% (#156)
Adjusted Efficiency
62.3 (#153) 61.1 (#153) NCAAM View โ†’
2010-2011 Stony Brook Record unavailable pending coaching-handoff evidence - - - - 984 (#172) 30.7% (#234)
Adjusted Efficiency
58.4 (#233) 62.3 (#233) NCAAM View โ†’
2009-2010 Stony Brook Record unavailable pending coaching-handoff evidence - - - - 1016 (#160) 43.1% (#190)
Adjusted Efficiency
65.3 (#180) 65.9 (#180) NCAAM View โ†’
2008-2009 Stony Brook Record unavailable pending coaching-handoff evidence - - - - 962 (#182) 43.4% (#189)
Adjusted Efficiency
61.9 (#201) 63.9 (#201) NCAAM View โ†’
2007-2008 Stony Brook Record unavailable pending coaching-handoff evidence - - - - 725 (#306) 14.7% (#290)
Adjusted Efficiency
57.5 (#292) 66.7 (#292) NCAAM View โ†’
2006-2007 Stony Brook Record unavailable pending coaching-handoff evidence - - - - 806 (#275) 18.4% (#271)
Adjusted Efficiency
58.6 (#266) 66.0 (#266) NCAAM View โ†’
2005-2006 Stony Brook Record unavailable pending coaching-handoff evidence - - - - 725 (#308) 10.1% (#311)
Adjusted Efficiency
58.4 (#302) 68.7 (#302) NCAAM View โ†’

Some 2025-2026 NCAA men's tournament games are withheld: unique source-backed coach ownership is not established.